News

Could a bold move by John Hanckock upend the insurance industry?

But some are wary of the burden companies take on with such massive quantities of consumer information. Kate Crawford, founder of the AI Now Institute, tweeted about the pitfalls of the Vitality program after John Hancock announced its widespread implementation: false data, consumers trying to game the system, “intimate” surveillance and data breaches.

AI Now Law and Policy Reading List

AI Now 2018 Symposium

California just replaced cash bail with algorithms

Rashida Richardson, policy director for AI Now, a nonprofit think tank dedicated to studying the societal impact of AI, tells Quartz that she’s skeptical that this system will be less biased than its predecessors.

ACLU Podcast: How to fight an algorithm

Facial recognition gives police a powerful new tracking tool. It’s also raising alarms.

“There needs to be greater transparency around the use of these technologies,” said Rashida Richardson, director of policy research at the AI Now Institute at New York University. “And a more open, public conversation about what types of use cases we are comfortable with — and what types of use cases should just not be available.”

You and AI – Machine learning, bias and implications for inequality

The New Age of Innovation: Government’s Role in Artificial Intelligence

Policy director Rashida Richardson discusses regulation of AI and its use in government on a panel alongside two members of congress and the head of the IT Industry Council.

Litigating Algorithms Workshop

Bias detectives – the researchers striving to make algorithms fair

As machine learning infiltrates society, scientists grapple with how to make algorithms fair

Litigating Algorithms

Silicon Valley is stumped – Even AI cannot always remove bias from hiring

Cofounder Meredith Whittaker raises concerns about AI products used in sourcing and hiring employees, questions their claims to "remove bias" from hiring, and calls for increased oversight and accountability.

If Machines Take Over, Who Will Be in Charge?

That limited group is introducing human biases into algorithms, warned Kate Crawford, co-founder of AI Now Research Institute. “In some ways, the people designing these systems are the least well-trained to think about the problems,” she said.

AI Experts Want Government Algorithms to Be Studied Like Environmental Hazards

AI Now, a nonprofit founded to study the societal impacts of AI, said an algorithmic impact assessment (AIA) would assure that the public and governments understand the scope, capability, and secondary impacts an algorithm could have, and people could voice concerns if an algorithm was behaving in a biased or unfair way.

How Coders Are Fighting Bias in Facial Recognition Software

“Lots of companies are now taking these things seriously, but the playbook for how to fix them is still being written,” says Meredith Whittaker, co-director of AI Now, an institute focused on ethics and artificial intelligence at New York University.

AI and Ethics: People, Robots and Society at Transformers: Artificial Intelligence | Washington Post Live

When Will Americans Be Angry Enough To Demand Honesty About Algorithms?

This week the AI Now Institute, a leading group studying the topic, published its own proposal. It’s called an “Algorithmic Impact Assessment,” or AIA, and it’s essentially an environmental impact report for automated software used by governments. “A similar process should take place before an agency deploys a new, high-impact automated decision system,” the group writes.

Artificial intelligence is going to supercharge surveillance

“The data they have is from police body cams, which tells us a lot about who an individual police officer may profile, but doesn’t give us a full picture,” says Whittaker. “There’s a real danger with this that we are universalizing biased pictures of criminality and crime.”