Related Publications [7]

AI Now submits comments to the Australian Human Rights Commission on AI and human rights

Mar 13, 2020

AI Now’s comments to Canada’s Office of the Privacy Commissioner on data privacy law and AI

Mar 12, 2020

AI Now’s Testimony to the EU Parliament on the Dangers of Predictive Policing

Feb 21, 2020

Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditing

Jan 3, 2020

Confronting Black Boxes: A Shadow Report of the New York City Automated Decision System Task Force

Dec 4, 2019

Litigating Algorithms 2019 U.S. Report: New Challenges to Government Use of Algorithmic Decision Systems

Sep 17, 2019

A Governance Framework for Algorithmic Accountability and Transparency

Apr 10, 2019

Related Press [9]

All Is Fair In Mortgage Lending And Fintech?

As Sarah Myers West, a postdoctoral researcher at New York University’s AI Now Institute explained to CBS News, “We turn to machine learning in the hopes that they'll be more objective, but really what they're doing is reflecting and amplifying historical patterns of discrimination and often in ways that are harder to see.”

Forbes

Aug 28, 2020

Big Tech juggles ethical pledges on facial recognition with corporate interests

"It shows that organizing and socially informed research works," said Meredith Whittaker, co-founder of the AI Now Institute, which researches the social implications of artificial intelligence. "But do I think the companies have really had a change of heart and will work to dismantle racist oppressive systems? No."

NBC News

Jun 22, 2020

Catholic leaders call for ethical guidelines around AI

Tech companies need binding, detailed policies that hold them accountable in addressing the many ethical concerns surrounding AI, says Meredith Whittaker, co-founder of the AI Now Institute at New York University.

Axios

Feb 28, 2020

US lawmakers concerned by accuracy of facial recognition

Ms Whittaker said corporate interest should not be allowed to "race ahead" and incorporate this technology into their systems without safeguards.

BBC

Jan 16, 2020

The Technology 202: Facial recognition gets another look on Capitol Hill today from skeptical lawmakers

Expect a divided group: Whittaker will call for policymakers and businesses to halt all use of facial recognition in sensitive social situations and political contexts, according to a press release.

The Washington Post

Jan 15, 2020

AI poses risks, but the White House says regulators shouldn’t “needlessly hamper” innovation

“It will take time to assess how effective these principles are in practice, and we will be watching closely,” said Rashida Richardson, the director of policy research at the AI Now Institute. “Establishing boundaries for the federal government and the private sector around AI technology will offer greater insight to those of us working in the accountability space.”

Vox

Jan 8, 2020

New York City couldn’t pry open its own black box algorithms. So now what?

But Rashida Richardson, the policy research director of AI Now, says that position isn’t nearly enough, as the role has neither the mandate nor the power to reveal what automated systems are in use.

Vox

Dec 18, 2019

Facial recognition tech is a problem. Here’s how the Democratic candidates plan to tackle it.Bernie Sanders’s call to ban facial recognition tech for policing, explained

Even if all the technical issues were to be fixed and facial recognition tech completely de-biased, would that stop the software from harming our society when it’s deployed in the real world? Not necessarily, as a recent report from the AI Now Institute explains.

Vox

Aug 21, 2019

Artificial Intelligence Makes Boosting ID Theft Protection Critical, House AI Task Force Chair Warns

“AI systems have evidenced a persistent pattern of gender and race-based discrimination. I have yet to encounter an AI system that was biased against white men,” Meredith Whittaker, co-founder of the AI Now Institute at New York University.

Forbes

Jun 27, 2019

Related Articles [2]